Visions of a Freeman -
Friday, November 29 of 2013
The U.S. says: Be ashamed
of being my client.
Take a look:
27 November 2013 Last
updated at 13:26 GMT
NSA 'planned to discredit radicals over
The US authorities have studied online
sexual activity and suggested exposing porn site visits as a way
to discredit people who spread radical views, the Huffington
Post news site has reported.
It published a document, leaked by former National Security
Agency contractor Edward Snowden, identifying two Muslims said
to be vulnerable to accusations of "online
An official said this was unsurprising.
But campaign group Privacy International called it
"Without discussing specific individuals, it should not be
surprising that the US government uses all of the lawful tools
at our disposal to impede the efforts of valid terrorist targets
who seek to harm the nation and radicalise others to violence,"
Shawn Turner, director of public affairs for National
Intelligence, told the Huffington Post.
Privacy International said: "This is not
the first time we've seen states use intimate and private
information of an individual who holds views the government
doesn't agree with, and exploit this information to undermine an
The report came shortly after a group of United Nations experts
adopted a "right to privacy" resolution.
It will be passed by the UN's General Assembly before the end of
the year, but is largely symbolic since it is not legally
The UN's Human Rights Committee said it was "deeply concerned at
the negative impact" the interception of data "including
extraterritorial surveillance" could have "in particular when
carried out on a mass scale".
The latest of Mr Snowden's leaked documents is dated October
2012 and says it was distributed by the office of the director
of the NSA to other US government officials.
It names six Muslims whom it describes as "prominent, globally
resonating foreign radicalisers" about whom surveillance efforts
had revealed potential "vulnerabilities that can be exploited".
It says the information is largely based on gathered "Sunni
extremist communications", including material sourced by the
"Some of the vulnerabilities, if exposed, would likely call into
question a radicaliser's devotion to the jihadist cause,
leading to the degradation or loss of his
authority," it says.
One example is evidence of the target "viewing
sexually explicit material online or using sexually
explicit persuasive language when communicating with
inexperienced young girls".
Others include proof of the target:
using donations to pay personal expenses
charging exorbitant speaking fees
using questionable sources and contradictory language in public
None of the six individuals who appear in the report are accused
of being directly involved in terrorism.
But the document says one of the two said to have been involved
in "online promiscuity" had
previously been imprisoned for inciting hatred against
non-Muslims, and the other had been involved in promoting
Of the four other targets, one is said to be
vulnerable to being exposed for being
"attracted to fame" and another for
having a "glamorous lifestyle".
Privacy International spokesman Mike Rispoli said: "What is
frightening about the NSA's capabilities are that they collect
massive amounts of information on everyone, including your
political beliefs, contacts, relationships and internet
"While these documents suggest this type of personal attacks are
targeted in nature, do not forget that the NSA is conducting
mass surveillance on the entire world and collecting a vast
amount of information on nearly everyone."
A spokeswoman for the NSA's UK equivalent - GCHQ - declined to
comment on details of the Huffington Post's report.
But she highlighted the UK government's
Counter-Terrorism Strategy, which discusses using the internet
to gather evidence against individuals in order to challenge
"All of GCHQ's work is carried out in accordance with a strict
legal and policy framework which ensures that its activities are
authorised, necessary and proportionate,
and that there is rigorous oversight," she added.
We were all born with genitals.
Let me remind you of the basics of humans. I want to be as clear as possible to
make my point as raw and exact as possible:
Little baby boys are born with a Penis.
Little baby girls are born with a Vagina.
Now is that surprising?
With those genitals come the instincts, the sexual instincts have been with our
ancestry human or not human for millions of years. As you know animals have
sexual instincts as well.
We are born with sexual instincts that come with out genitals.
I am a man, I properly have my genitals and my sexual instincts and so I do like
to see naked women, like most men that use their genitals do as well. If that is
surprising to you then you need to grow up, I doubt you are surprised men have
Women like sex too, it comes from her sexual instincts as well, born with her as
well with her genitals.
Most of us have or had genitals.
Our genitals tell us to like sex.
Visual Sex is part of the sexual satisfaction of some men to please the craving
produced by the genitals. Visual Sex is part of the Sexual Instinct and thus I
have seen images of naked women that my genitals reach to. The eyes can arouse
the genitals. Sex can be stimulated with the eyes. I think we can all agree that
at least it does happen to some people...
Some have tried to deny sexual instincts happen because of genitals and
instincts, for example:
1) Priests were told not to pay attention to
genitals. Then we saw some cases of sexual abuse to children.
2) Muslims are told to ignore genitals. Then we see
far more rape then they want to admit.
3) Jewish are told to ignore genitals. Then we see
so called "Jewish Porn star" on a "religious" media.
Now... Do you expect me to tell you all to ignore that genitals exist as well?
You probably already know I am not that foolish. I will not deny an entire
instinct and body part.
But the fact that everyone does have genitals means there are rules to abide to.
Rules for a good genital user.
Lets make some things clear:
Genitals go under the underwear.
You do not go around displaying your genitals on the street.
Sex is an instinct, it happens with or without
publicity so no need for publicity.
Some people are incapable or
unwilling to stop wanting to watch pornography even if they are married.
They will defy all rules even if Pornography is made illegal, they are
willing to challenge the law.
So I proposed for those people two simple calls of consciousness:
If you are willing to commit a
crime to watch porn, at least do NOT see
porn made with short term prostitutes and watch porn with permanent jobs
Avoid Pornography that you must
pay to watch.
Avoid Pornography that uses real
people, replace with computer generated characters, that way you know
you are not spoiling or helping to spoil in a direct way the life of a
If you can stop watching porn try to have a real sex life.
Sex in video is not always prostitution even if it
Some videos are just made for free and shared in free sites. They can
still cause damage to the person that makes it and promote lack of
The minute you pay for pornography it is converted into prostitution,
even if the video is free and was made for free.
Looking at sexual material that
arouses the genitals is an instinctual behavior and it should be a
Masturbation is the use of genitals for personal pleasure.
All forms of masturbation are the use of genitals and
do not require it to be directly related to prostitution or promiscuity
if nothing was paid to observe it.
There is no such thing as
"Online Promiscuity" if nothing is paid and no real person was involved
on real time, since masturbation is based on the imaginary people tend
to change the imaginary person they do sex with. Multiple images does
not mean promiscuity since the brain itself tends to imagine multiple
faces at different times.
Masturbation is stimulated by the brain, it is
natural because the brain wants sexual activity even if the person has
no one close to do sex with. Sometimes it can be controlled, sometimes
the person does not want to control it and masturbates.
Watching pornography is
generally a masturbation activity. A natural occurring thing specially
on male humans that have easy access to it and are lonely or do not have
a female love. But distributing it is not natural.
Distributing pornography is the real dishonorable
act, even worse if it is sold. Then it is not something that is a part
of the sexual needs of the brain and genitals but actually a wanting for
profits out of prostitution and thus a desire to contribute to social
decay and an increase in crime in exchange for money.
Masturbation is natural on
humans, specially if they are lonely.
Masturbation is a private act, so masturbation is in
the space of private dignity of the person. Masturbating is as private
as touching our own genitals, and that is what it is all about.
I do masturbate.
I am a lonely man, healthy and like most healthy men without a women I
But that does not mean I want to distribute pictures of naked women.
That does not mean I like women's lives ruined, women enslaved, children
without parents or broken families and more crime. I do not go and look
for real people to produce pornography that they might later regret. I
am a responsible man and most men want to be responsible as well. Most
of us never do pornography or help make it.
One thing is to masturbate, and another very different is to profit from
So the country with the biggest industries of
PROSTITUTION wants to accuse
people of masturbating.
That is so ridiculous.
Listen, telling other people that someone masturbates is not only a serious
violation of the dignity of a person, it is also:
ONE MORE EXCUSE TO TRY TO JUSTIFY