Visions of a Freeman -
Brain Age - 19, July of 2014
Let them die, it is good
for us, says Holland.
A murder that could have been avoided, that was not because
it served a supposedly "higher moral cause".
I will not say anything new, I will say what is so obvious it is already in the
media. The day Holland said: "I don't care if those people die, if they do it is
even better for us".
Take a look:
SATURDAY, JULY 19, 2014
MH17 is the third plane this week shot down
over Ukraine under mysterious circumstances
Updated by Max Fisher on July 18, 2014, 11:44 a.m. ET
We don't yet know who shot down Malaysian Airlines flight MH17,
which went down over eastern Ukraine on Thursday. There's no
conclusive evidence so far, but speculation is centering on the
pro-Russia rebels who have been operating in the region for the
last few months.
It's not hard to see why: they are, after all, anti-government
rebels who have been attacking Ukrainian government forces. But
it's more than that. Rebels have shot down
planes before, although they were all military aircraft.
And, very recently, Ukrainian military
planes in the area have been getting hit with missiles while
flying at high altitudes — which suggests that, as with
MH17, whoever was shooting at them had some awfully advanced
Planes have been shot down
with increasing frequency over eastern Ukraine
Four Ukrainian military planes have been
shot down since June. Two of those incidents appear to
have almost certainly have been caused by rebels, apparently
demonstrating that they have the ability
and willingness to shoot down a plane. But
the other two were shot down at a
high altitude, like the MH17 flight was, and
it's not nearly as clear who was responsible.
On June 6, rebels shot down an Ukrainian
Air Force Antonov AN-30 surveillance plane — a
medium-size, two-propeller military craft that's typically
Russian-made. This was near Slavyansk, in eastern Ukraine.
Ten days later, on June 16, rebels shot
down a big Ukrainian Air Force transport plane, an Il-76,
killing all 49 people on board. An Il-76 is much larger than an
AN-30 and has four jet engines, more the size of the Boeing 777
that was downed on Thursday.
There's a "but" that makes these two cases very distinct from
MH17, though — the AN-30 and ILl-6 were
shot down by MANPADS, which stands for man-portable
air-defense systems, a small missile launcher you carry on your
shoulder. It can only fire to an altitude
of about 11,500 feet, but MH17 was
flying at 33,000 feet. That's way, way outside of the range of
shoulder-fired MANPADS missiles.
That's why, at first, people were wondering if rebels even had
the capability to shoot down a high-flying commercial airliner
like MH17. But there was another incident
just on Monday, July 14, that did not get very much attention at
the time. That day, over eastern Ukraine,
an Antonov AN-26 Ukrainian military
transport plane was hit by a missile while flying over eastern
Ukraine — at 21,000 feet altitude.
That's far beyond the range of a
shoulder-fired system like the MANPADS.
Ukraine has been blaming Russia — not
rebels — for high-altitude shoot-downs
The Ukrainian government didn't blame the ragtag separatist
rebels for Monday's shoot-down, though: it suggested that the
missile had possibly been fired from Russia, which borders
eastern Ukraine. Ukrainian rebels took credit, though, and
Ukraine has not presented public evidence pinning the shoot-down
on Russian forces.
The BBC's David Stern wrote at the time, "The accusation that
Russian forces shot down a Ukrainian transport plane is
potentially a game changer. If Russia is indeed targeting
Ukrainian aeroplanes from inside its territory, it is an act of
aggression of the highest order." Still, Stern acknowledged,
"For the Ukrainians not to respond would raise the suspicion
that their charge is false — or demonstrate that the Ukrainian
military is completely powerless."
Ukraine's lack of a stronger response or presentation of
evidence blaming Russia may explain why the Monday shoot-down
got comparatively little attention. On the one hand, Russia does
have thousands of troops — as many as 12,000 — amassed along its
border with eastern Ukraine, and Moscow has actively backed the
eastern Ukrainian rebels. On the other hand, firing missiles at
Ukrainian aircraft across the border would be a remarkably
provocative move, even for Russia.
Then, on Wednesday, a Ukrainian Sukhoi
SU-25 fighter jet was shot down over eastern Ukraine, and
the Ukrainian government did not at all equivocate in blaming
Russia. "A Russian Federation armed forces plane delivered a
missile strike at a Ukraine armed forces Su-25 jet which was
carrying out tasks over the territory of Ukraine," Ukrainian
government official Andrey Lysenko announced at a press
High-altitude shoot-downs like MH17 require
complicated, high-tech military hardware
The first few planes shot down over eastern
Ukraine were all shot down at low altitude, and apparently by
rebels carrying shoulder-mounted MANPADS. While tragic,
this was not shocking: eastern Ukraine is an open conflict zone,
the rebels are firing at every Ukrainian military target they
can find, and MANPADS are basic enough for ragtag irregulars
like the eastern Ukrainian rebels to operate.
But the technology of shooting down a
high-altitude plane such as MH17, or
the high-altitude Ukrainian military aircraft shot down earlier
in the week, is much more complex.
Analysts are saying the most likely tool is
the Buk surface-to-air missile system, typically Russian-made
but also used by the Ukrainian military. The Buk system
has an altitude range of about 50,000 feet, but it is much more
complicated than a shoulder-fired missile.
That may be why US officials are now saying they believe the
plane was likely shot down by an SA-11 system, which is
the American designation for the Buk.
Ok, first part colored. As you can clearly see Holland knew there was a shark in
the water. There is no doubt about that. The United States and the entire
European Union knew there was a shark in the water and as you can see the shark
had already eaten a swimmer (The high flying military plane). From that news you
can clearly see that there was NO WAY AT ALL that
they did not know there was a KILLER SHARK in the
water. They were very well aware of it.
They did not close the beach even if there was a killer shark that just killed a
swimmer... In Australia that is GROUNDS
FOR BEING THROWN IN JAIL! Is it not?
That friends is called: CRIMINAL NEGLIGENCE and it
is a crime simply because it causes, as you just saw, hundreds of deaths. Even
if we use the laws of a basic Australian Beach, you can clearly see something is
VERY WRONG. Why is it that if it is a shark that can
attack and maybe eat just one person laws are strict and it can send people to
jail for criminal negligence but if it is a MISSILE
LAUNCHER that can kill HUNDREDS OF PEOPLE
there is no law?
HOLLAND IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CRIMINAL NEGLIGENCE, PERIOD!!!
You can blame the shark of course, but that does not mean there was no criminal
negligence anyway. The shark is just an animal.
They even saw the shark breaking away from it's cage:
Ukraine Rebels Stole Same Type Of Missiles That May Have Taken
From Foxtrot Alpha: It seems clear
that the Ukrainian anti-aircraft missile defense regiment A-1402
was overran and looted by pro-Russian forces on June 29th.
This unit operated the SA-11/17 "Buk"
medium-range mobile air defense system, an advanced decedent of
the SA-6, that is thought to have been used in the MH17 attack.
It seems clear that the Ukrainian
anti-aircraft missile defense regiment A-1402 was overran and
looted by pro-Russian forces on June 29th. This unit
operated the SA-11/17 "Buk" medium-range mobile air defense
system, an advanced cousin of the SA-6, that is thought to have
been used in the MH17 attack.
Since then, "Buk" components have
been seen and photographed around contested and rebel controlled
areas in Eastern Ukraine, one was even photographed near the
impact point of MH17, in Snejnoe, adding to the
theory that pro-Russian rebels shot down MH17 by mistake.
While another, seen below, was spotted
traveling on a highway near the area.
Meanwhile, Russia's news agencies are implying that it was an
assassination attempt onhttp://youtu.be/Yoz8nAp9x6w Vladmir
Putin who was flying in the region on his way back from South
America. Such reports seem coincidental at best.
Nada más desaparecer el avión B 777 de Malaysia Airlines la
autoridad militar de kiev nos informo del derribo, como lo
— ✈ Carlos. (@spainbuca) July 17, 2014
Even an air traffic controller claims MH17
was being escorted by Ukrainian fighters at the time of
incident. Also, there is supposedly a radio transmission
between pro-Russian militants that says they shot down a
civilian jet by accident, although the
authenticity of the conversation is suspect. So there is
a lot of conflicting reports out there,
although the taking of missile defense unit A-1402 by
separatists and the newly surfaced pictures of "Buk" systems in
the region add a lot of evidence to the possibility that
the downing of MH17 was a rebel operation.
With all this in mind, one has to wonder
how Western intelligence agencies did not alert ICAO that there
were SAMs in pro-Russian rebel hands capable of reaching up and
taking down airliners flying high-up in the flight levels. This
is especially relevant considering the downing of a high-flying
the An-26 just days earlier, not to mention Russia's massive
buildup of air defense capabilities on the border.
If the airspace was indeed open, then this
whole disaster could have been averted by simply warning
civilian flights to steer clear of the area.
Tyler Rogoway is a defense journalist and photographer that
maintains the website Foxtrot Alpha for Jalopnik.com You can
reach Tyler with story ideas or direct comments regarding this
or any other defense topic via the email address
Now it is not just one shark, it's MANY SHARKS that
have been seen in the beach, and one of them even ate a swimmer and even it that
is undeniably true, HOLLAND the life saver of the
Beach game total authorization for a new swimmer to swim in the shark infested
beach fully knowing about the presence of a killer shark.
What would happen in Australia if a life guard knowing full well the beach was
full of sharks and that the day before a swimmer was killed a swimmer tells a
swimmer he is clear for safe swimming? That swimmer trusted in him and put
his confidence in the capacity of the life saver to save his life. The life
saver told him it was safe to swim producing even if all scientific evidence
strongly indicated otherwise and that produced the death of the swimmer. And
what if it is not just one swimmer killed by the shark, but
MORE THAN TWO HUNDRED?
You think the courts in Australia would not find him guilty and lock him for the
rest of his life for CRIMINAL NEGLIGENCE?
When there was tragedy of 9/11 in the United States, everyone blamed the
Terrorists from Al-Quaeda but even so there was a massive scandal as to the
capability of the Intelligence community to protect the people of the United
States from such attacks and the scandal of the alleged gross incompetence of
the Intelligence community was huge.
You don't see not one comment on the equally gross incompetence of the
Government of Holland which was several times better informed about the risks
than the United States ever was on the 9/11 terrorist attack. Why is the
alarming incompetence of European and specially the Dutch Government not even
mentioned? Because the mass media is covering up for them, simple as that. The
same media that want a conflict with Russia, no coincidence.
Now for the covering up.
The media war propaganda machine (Now lets profit says FoxNews):
Malaysia Air crash: Missile launcher used to down jet likely
back in Russia, US official says
Published July 19, 2014FoxNews.com
The missile launcher used to down Malaysia Air flight MH17 is
probably back in Russia
after it was imported into Ukraine a few
weeks ago, a well-placed source
with access to the latest intelligence told Fox News Friday
Meanwhile, the same source said the missile that brought down
the plane, killing all 298 on board, was fired from Schnidze, a
town in eastern Ukraine.
"We are building a case," the senior U.S. official told Fox
News. "It is damn near bulletproof at this point."
The U.S. intelligence community used infrared data, measurements
and electronic signals, among other methods, to determine the
origin of the missile's path.
A report by the Daily Mail showed the SA-11 launcher used in the
attack missing two of its four missiles. A
senior U.S. defense official confirmed the newspaper's report.
The local separatist commander who
likely ordered the strike, Igor Strelkov -- who
was heard in some of the phone intercepts released by the
Ukrainian Interior Ministry bragging about having brought down
the plane -- will likely
be punished by Moscow, according to a well-placed source.
Pro-Russian rebels and the Ukrainian government-- who have
engaged in deadly battles in several cities of eastern Ukraine
in recent months-- have traded charges about who was responsible
for the tragedy.
President Obama said Friday at least one American was among the
passengers killed aboard the flight, and said the plane
appears to have
been downed by a missile launched from Ukraine by pro-Russian
The Boeing 777 bound for Kuala Lumpur from Amsterdam was shot
down Thursday afternoon at cruising altitude about 35 miles from
the border, according to Anton Gerashenko, an adviser to
Ukraine's Interior Minister.
On Saturday, Australian Prime Minister Tony
Abbott called for an independent, international investigation
into the downing of the jetliner, which killed 28 Australians,
and demanded Russia's full cooperation.
"This is a problem — a very serious problem," Abbott said.
"Australia takes a very dim view of countries which facilitate
the killing of Australians. The idea that Russia can wash its
hands of responsibility because this happened in Ukrainian
airspace just does not stand up to serious scrutiny. We all know
what's happening in the Ukraine."
Emergency workers in contact with officials in Kiev said on
Friday that 181 bodies had been recovered from the crash site,
of the 283 passengers and 15 crew members aboard the flight.
Ukraine Foreign Ministry representative Andriy Sybiga said the
bodies will be taken to Kharkiv, a government-controlled city
170 miles to the north, for identification.
The whereabouts of the plane's flight data recorder and cockpit
voice recorder remained unknown Friday. Separatist rebels who
control the crash site issued conflicting reports Friday about
whether they had found the plane's black boxes or not.
"No black boxes have been found ... we hope that experts will
track them down and create a picture of what has happened," said
Donetsk separatist leader Aleksandr Borodai.
Yet earlier Friday, an aide to the military leader of Borodai's
group said authorities had recovered eight out of 12 recording
devices. Since planes usually have two black boxes -- one for
recording flight data and the other for recording cockpit voices
-- it was not clear what the number 12
Anatomy of a War Propaganda.
Data without a clear limit source:
Russia after it was imported into Ukraine a few
The use of probability to help stimulate hatred and conflict:
A media does not use probability to reduce tensions in times where it is needed,
such behavior stimulates hate & war.
The use of ghosts:
U.S. defense official confirmed the newspaper's report
Something like this requires full accountability and "leadership", not cowards
so shy and unsure of themselves they cannot even face the people of the United
States and that is certainly not what they are being paid for anyway. Of course
it can all be just a lie of FoxNews, but ghosts are not accepted in delicate
moments of world tension. It is a criminal irresponsibility of Rupert Murch of
FoxNews to try to worsen the conflict irresponsibly for his personal profit and
that of his disgusting business that profits from human tragedy.
Now to comment on what Tony said:
On Saturday, Australian Prime
Minister Tony Abbott called for an independent, international investigation into
the downing of the jetliner, which killed 28 Australians, and demanded Russia's
Tony Abbot is an Australian. Now, what does Tony want the Russians to tell them?
They want the Russians to say that there was obviously sharks in the beach?
Everybody knew that! I am surprised Tony did not know... But I am not going to
complain to Tony yet he can't say the shark was not obvious. Tony already knows
he cannot allow Aussies to swim in shark infested waters or Planes in Missile
infested air. Yet he has enough troubles already.
"This is a
problem — a very serious problem," Abbott said. "Australia takes a very dim view
of countries which facilitate the killing of Australians.
Countries that facilitate the killing of Australians... What about countries
that due to their criminal negligence cause the death of Australians? Are those
just as bad as well? How would an Australian react if three Aussie tourists in the
Philippines were bitten by sharks and killed and he is told a tourist had died
the day before and the Philippines did nothing to alert the Aussies? He would
have a conflict with the Philippines, obviously. So why not with Holland that
took Aussies for a swim in the shark pool?
The idea that
Russia can wash its hands of responsibility because this happened in Ukrainian
airspace just does not stand up to serious scrutiny.
Holland cannot wash it's hands from responsibility and if
we talk about scrutiny, what is begging to be scrutinized is the Dutch
Government and the security it is offering to people. It was by all means a very
serious and obvious intelligence failure even worse that the one that allowed
the 9/11 tragedy and people should be made accountable for it so as to ensure
such failures do not happen again.
We all know what's happening in the Ukraine."
That is the issue, that is exactly the issue! Everyone knew what was happening
yet nobody did what had to be done, which makes the matters even worse. The
existence of a shark does not mean a life guard is devoid of all security
responsibilities, like I said before a shark is just an animal and much can be
done and was not done to prevent the tragedy from happening due to a lax
compromise with security at the best case, that ended up being a flagrant case
of CRIMINAL NEGLIGENCE.
We all know it was a shark. What is the point of fighting to determine it was a
shark? We have to focus on why the shark was allowed to kill the swimmer in what
is obviously a very serious security error in the best of cases. No point in
accusing the shark, the shark is just a shark, it's an irrational animal, it's
about what can be done from PREVENTING SHARK ATTACKS
what really matters, but nobody seems to care. Which leads Me to conclude it was
intentional and there is complicity, but I did not say Australia is involved and
I will not fall into that trap.
Holland's silence on what is obviously a very serious security failure makes the
Dutch Government very suspicious and the media covering up for it just makes the
case even worse. All that provides the scientific ground to state that the Dutch
Government simply did not care because any tragedy could be used against the
Russians, so they allowed the plane to fly to it's imminent doom...
A wonderful propaganda tool against the Russians.
I might be wrong but why the silence in the media about the security failure and
why there is no blame on Dutch Intelligence? Coincidence? No such thing in
science. At the worse case they allowed it, at the best case they are guilty of
criminal negligence and covering up for it with complicity of the criminal media
who want to use the news as a propaganda tool, something not strange for people
that profit from crime on a regular basis.
Will Australia like or even allow Aussie citizens to be subjected to the crime
of criminal negligence of other countries? Why is there no protest for what is
by all means more than evident? Or is it complicity?
Back to FoxNews: War propaganda is
illegal in Venezuela. This is just one more example of the frequent illegal
activities that FoxNews does in Venezuela without us taking legal actions to
stop those criminal activities. It is time we made FoxNews accountable for it's
media crimes and if the Government of the United States does not care, at least
block them out from Venezuela for being a criminal media.
FoxNews trying to use Australia.
FoxNews sends the War Cry based on serious violations to ethics in a time of
great tension, using ghosts and suppositions at the worst possible time to throw
gasoline at the conflict and raise the war hatred, that is why it is a war cry,
I would call it a war crime. In times of great tension ethics must be increased,
They used two people that had the potential to look like it was going to stop Me
from denouncing the crime. Known that I am the main media critic around and the
only one with the clearance to do it. The first person they might have thought
about in trying to block Me is Tony Abbot, the Prime Minister of Australia.
Well whatever the plan I am not going to fight with Tony Abbott, Murdoch is
Australian so there is no reason to believe that is not what he wants. Besides
Australia has done Me no wrong and is a country that defends the dignity of good
women. I will not fall for Murdoch's obvious bait.
But it gets worse and far more obvious they tried to block My intervention...
Emma Hewitt @emhewitt · 17 de jul.
CHEERS!!!! A giant coffee before heading off to the airport join
the Electronic Family party in Amsterdam
CHEERS!!!! A giant coffee before heading off to the airport join
the Electronic Family party in Amsterdam
this weekend…gonna be HUUUUGE!!! :)xox — with Zam Hernandez
Bernardino, Ivo Marcelo Yañez, Maamar Houadef and 32 others.
For those that do not know Amsterdam is a Dutch city
and the Dutch live in Holland.
Emma is a decent woman and she would never help cover up any crime and even less
a crime related to airplanes since Emma herself is a very frequent flying. She
has nothing to do with it and did not even try to cover up or stop Me from
denouncing the Criminal Negligence of the Dutch Government.
But the Government could have used her as an insurance policy to make sure I do
not say what is obvious, so they moved Emma to Holland to try to shield
themselves and of course, Emma would never allow that because My BOSS Emma is
not a criminal trying to cover massive crimes & the Dutch Government's
complicity if it is the worst case and criminal Negligence at the best case, but a crime
It also shows that the Airline security system of Europe is not doing what it
can to protect the civilian passengers and I believe that is a strong reason to
protest to avoid any more cases like the tragedy in Ukraine from happening again
due to a surprising negligence and incompetence.
It would save a lot of suffering for the world, contributing with peace.