Welcome to:
Prospects.
Creating the Future.

    
Reality seen from the Eyes of a TRIBalance.
  
Date is:
August 28, 2017

The Guardian's Attack on Australian Science.

A Case where the Industry of Ignorance abuses Ethics.
The Dresden Dolls-Missed Me (With Lyrics!)
  
  
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2017/aug/28/pelvic-mesh-victims-disgusted-at-suggestion-of-sodomy-as-solution
Health
Pelvic mesh victims disgusted at suggestion of anal sex as solution
‘Only a misogynist could think this way,’ says Australian woman in response to her doctor’s solution to painful intercourse
  
1666.jpg
Emails reflecting callous attitude to pelvic mesh problems from French doctors linked to Johnson & Johnson accord with evidence before Senate inquiry. Photograph: Emily Critchfield/Duke Health

Christopher Knaus
Monday 28 August 2017 08.05 BST

Australian victims of faulty pelvic mesh implants have expressed disgust at doctors’ suggestions of anal intercourse as a solution to their ruined sex lives.

A disturbing email exchange between doctors emerged earlier this month as part of a federal court class action in Australia, which was launched by hundreds of women who had the devices implanted to treat common childbirth complications.

The devices, manufactured by pharmaceutical giant Johnson & Johnson, caused chronic and debilitating pain, including during intercourse.

The emails reflected a callous attitude towards women among French gynaecologists involved with the company.

In the emails, doctors talk about alternatives to sex for women suffering painful intercourse. “It is no less true that sodomy could be a good alternative!” one doctor wrote. Another discussed the difficulty of raising sexual matters with his patients.

“I said to myself, there you go, for your next prolapse [patient], you talk to her about orgasms. OK! But also about fellatio, sodomy, the clitoris with or without G-spot etc,” he wrote. “I am sure of one thing: that I would very quickly be treated like some kind of sex maniac (which, perhaps, I am) or a pervert, or an unhealthily curious person.”

The attitudes accord with evidence before the current Senate inquiry into the devices, which has heard women were advised to consider anal intercourse as a solution to the extreme pain caused by intercourse.

The comments outraged members of the Australian Pelvic Mesh Support Group, which sent Guardian Australia a collection of anonymised responses from women to the revelations.

Many of the women said they had encountered similar attitudes from their own doctors.

“My husband and I were given advice [about] sexual activity,” one woman said. “We were gobsmacked. The whole sexual deviation thing is supposed to make the pain and complications from mesh go away. I find this type of advice disgusting.”

Another woman said the comments were demoralising and devalued women. She said they represented another form of abuse.

Our vaginas have been abused by mesh and now doctors are suggesting our anus be abused. Despicable! Only a misogynist could think this way,” she said.

A third woman wrote that the “appalling” comments showed a complete lack of respect to the women involved. Another wrote that they suggested women were nothing more than a receptacle to satisfy men.

“The suggestion that women who are unable to have vaginal intercourse should practise anal instead completely devalues a woman’s right to a full and healthy sex life as an active, empowered and fulfilled participant,” she said.

It suggests that a woman is nothing more than a receptacle to satisfy men and that ‘any hole will do’. I’m appalled that anyone, particularly a woman’s treating medical practitioner, would be so thoughtless and arrogant as to suggest that anal sex is an adequate solution to sexual dysfunction.”

Greens senator Rachel Siewert is chairing the senate inquiry into the devices. Siewert described the treatment of many of the women as appalling.

“The way many women have been treated when trying to get treatment and support when they have had bad outcomes from mesh implants is appalling, including suggestions by medical professionals that anal intercourse is an alternative to vaginal intercourse after mesh implants have gone terribly wrong,” she said.

“We have heard a lot of harrowing evidence during the inquiry – so many women have been horribly impacted by mesh implants. There is a clear pattern emerging of poor processes and advice which is leading to women having their lives severely impacted.”

The class action is continuing in the federal court.
  
Johnson & Johnson
  
  
‘Only a misogynist could think this way,’ says Australian woman in response to her doctor’s solution to painful intercourse
  
Says an Australian Women with not enough Human Dignity to even have a name as The Guardian attacks Thousands of Australian Doctors with unfair, Biased and Hurtful Comments.
  
French doctors linked to Johnson & Johnson accord with evidence
   
The Photo has nothing to do with any Evidence against any French Doctor and then again Ethics was broken.
  
A disturbing email exchange
   
That text indicates that there is a strong Bias of The Guardian involved in that news.
  
French doctors linked to Johnson & Johnson accord
with evidence
between doctors

French gynaecologists
doctors
their own doctors
suggestions by medical professionals
poor processes and advice
   
What is sure is that The Guardian is engaging in a Poor Process in the Middle of Slamming Doctors and that can cause a Health Issue.
  
1) sex for women suffering painful intercourse
2) extreme pain caused by intercourse
3) the pain and complications from mesh
4) Our vaginas have been abused by mesh
5) women who are unable to have vaginal intercourse
6) solution to sexual dysfunction
7) bad outcomes from mesh implants is appalling
8) after mesh implants have gone terribly wrong
9) women have been horribly impacted by mesh implants
   
“The suggestion that women who are unable to have vaginal intercourse should practise anal instead completely devalues a woman’s right to a full and healthy sex life as an active, empowered and fulfilled participant,” she said.
   
1) disgust
2) like some kind of sex maniac
3) a pervert
4) an unhealthily curious person
5) We were gobsmacked
6) this type of advice disgusting
7) comments were demoralising and devalued women
8) another form of abuse
9) suggesting our anus be abused
10) Despicable!
11) Only a misogynist could think this way
12) the “appalling” comments
13) a complete lack of respect to the women involved
14) women were nothing more than a receptacle to satisfy men
15) It suggests that a woman is nothing more than a receptacle to satisfy men and that ‘any hole will do’
16) I’m appalled
17) thoughtless and arrogant
18) appalling
   
That was a Biased, Full Blown Attack against the Medical Profession of Hundreds of Australian Doctors. Attack that did not have any Scientific Evidence worth anything, since most of it is totally Anonymous. The lack of Ethics of the Guardian does not allow a reasonable trust in it's word, trust which in that case is zero in the Scientific Community.

What really happened.

Delta was attacked and she sent a Letter of Complaint using the Twitter Account. I am not a Mesh and Delta's Twitter Account is not a Vagina.

It is not proper for an Artist to take on every Imitator on a one on one fight. That might seem fine with one aggressor but it looks really bad when the aggressions are constant. So I recommend that the Artist promotes it's Web Site as the Launching Platform for all her products. Someone else, Identified as the marketing Team should send those, include what product is not currently supported and ask Users to avoid Piracy. The Guardian took that Approach as Anal Intercourse because it depends on a Back Door, to try to Sexually Harass Me as well as Sexually Hurt Delta Goodrem, who is Clearly Australian.

The Guardian did not respect the Medical Profession of Hundreds of Australian Doctors that deserve respect and a Dignified treatment, did not follow proper Journalism Ethics and did not issue a single Scientific Argument. If The Guardian would do that to Reputable Doctors, it is understood it would be much worse in it's respect for Delta Goodrem or any Australian Celebrity. So I believe that the Australian Scientific Community and the Australian Art Community should send a note of Protest against The Guardian for Severe Offences against Australian Professionals using a Severely Crippled Concept of Journalism Ethics.

I once again ask the Decent, Honest, Sane British People to Demand the Immediate Expulsion of The Guardian's Chief Editor, Katherine Viner for her continued Abuse of Journalism that is Severely Hurting the British Reputation and Kate Middleton's Future.

I ask the British and the Australians to have Better Relations in the Scope of Kate Middleton being a House Guest and in the Scope of My Friendship with Delta Goodrem while Kate Middleton is My Guest.

We all want respect to the Scientific Community. We don't need Doctors being Offended and it's Patients Paranoiac to protect a kind of Journalism that does not provide any benefit to Society and spreads Superstition and attacks against Science with little to no Concern for Honour and Ethics in General, which means it is not entitled to attack Doctors.

I AM SUING THE GUARDIAN FOR 10,000,000$!!!

For the Crimes of:
  
1) Severe Sexual Harassment.
2) Intimidation with Sexual Harassment.
3) Intimidation and Sexual Harassment using Delta Goodrem.
4) Intimidation and Sexual Harassment with Australia.
5) Generic Harassment against My Words, used against Me.
6) The use of Severe Ethical Breaks to try to Anger Me.
   
If that line of abuse continues I might sue the Australian Government for Complicity involving Damage done to Australian Medical Professionals.

Australia should Protect Delta Goodrem and Emma Hewitt, even more so against British Abuse, abuse that breaks the Agreement between Britain and Australia as well as the Common Wealth Principles of Respect.

  

Lyrics:
  

"Missed Me" - The Dresden Dolls

Missed me, missed me, now you've got to kiss me
If you kiss me, mister, I might tell my sister
If I tell her, mister, she might tell my mother
And my mother, mister, she might tell my father
And my father mister, he won't be too happy
And he'll have his lawyer come up from the city and arrest you, mister
So I wouldn't miss me if you get me, mister, see

Missed me, missed, me now you've got to kiss me
If you kiss me, mister, you must think I'm pretty
If you think so, mister, you must want to fuck me
If you fuck me, mister, it must mean you love me
If you love me, mister, you would never leave me
It's as simple as can be

Missed me, missed me, now you've got to kiss me
If you miss me, mister, why do you keep leaving?
If you trick me, mister, I will make you suffer
And they'll get you, mister, put you in the slammer
And forget you, mister, then you'll miss me, won't you?
Won't you miss me? Won't you miss me? Won't you miss me?

Missed me, missed me, now you've got to kiss me
If you kiss me, mister, take responsibility
I'm fragile, mister, just like any girl would be
And so misunderstood, so treat me delicately

Missed me, missed me, now you've gone and done it
Hope you're happy in the county penitentiary
It serves you right for kissing little girls
But I will visit, if you miss me, say you miss me

How's the food they feed you?
Do you miss me?
Will you kiss me through the window?
Do you miss me, miss me?
Will they ever let you go?
I miss my mister so

Compositores: Amanda Palmer
Letra de Missed Me © Kobalt Music Publishing Ltd.

Back to index