Welcome to:
Prospects.
Creating the Future.

    
Reality seen from the Eyes of a TRIBalance.
  
Date is:
August 14, 2017

Saying no to Judicial Corruption Dance Shows.
  
   
Chris De Burgh - The Lady in Red (Subtitulado en español)
   
Judicial and Media Corruption in the United States.

Do I have to tolerate Rupert Murdoch's FoxNews Sexual Abuse and Grope just because he wants a good, corrupt and sick Judicial Nobility Show?

Well
allow Me to prove that news is really just a cover up for sexual abuse against Me, by Murdoch and explain how Judicial Corruption allows for such abuses.
  
http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2017/08/14/taylor-swift-trial-singer-cries-during-closing-arguments-in-alleged-groping-case.html
IN COURT

Taylor Swift trial: Singer cries during closing arguments in alleged groping case

By Kelly David Burke, Sasha Savitsky Published August 14, 2017 Fox News

NOW PLAYING
Taylor Swift groping trial: What you need to know


Taylor Swift became emotional during part of closing arguments in her civil trial alleging that a former radio DJ groped her before a 2013 concert.

The singer cried in court Monday as former DJ David Mueller's attorney, Gabriel McFarland, questioned whether the pop star's smiling face in a photo she appeared in with Mueller was the face of someone who was upset.

McFarland told jurors in his closing arguements his client "is not the guy" who groped Swift.

MORE: Taylor Swift's alleged groping photo

"It's impossible that Mr. Mueller has his hand under her skirt and on her rear or we would see skirt disturbed in the photo of the alleged incident," McFarland argued. He posed to the jury, "Why would [Mueller] throw away his dream job? There's no good reason."
  
Swift's mother, Andrea Swift, touched her daughter's right leg as Swift cried and wiped her face in federal court in Denver. Her lawyer also rubbed her back.

Andrea Swift touched Swift's hand as McFarland said the photograph taken during the meet-and-greet meant nothing.

When the attorney suggested that Swift would not have kept her arm over Mueller's if he had grabbed her backside, Swift silently mouthed "wow."

Swift's lawyer also pointed to Mueller's expression in the photo as proof. Without using the expletive, lawyer Douglas Baldridge said, "That is an S-eating smile right there."

Swift testified the photo was taken just as she was groped by Mueller, who denied the allegation.

Swift's attorney Douglas Baldridge said the singer is standing up for all women in her federal lawsuit by taking on a man who she claimed groped her.

TAYLOR SWIFT: 'I FELT HIM GRAB ONTO MY BARE ASS CHEEK'

Baldridge characterized Mueller as an "aggressor" in his closing arguments, asking jurors, "Will aggressors like David Mueller be allowed to victimize their victims?"

Citing Swift's counterclaim alleging assault and battery, Baldridge asks jurors to "return a verdict for a single dollar, a single symbolic dollar, the value of which is immeasurable to all women in this situation."

The case was handed over to the jury for deliberation on Monday afternoon. Court is currently in recess until either questions come from the jury or there is a definitive verdict.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

You can find Sasha Savitsky on Twitter @SashaFB.

In the
United States the Judicial System is Corrupted by Media Money. The most Evident Proof of that is the Judicial Extremist Political Show on FoxNews called: "Judge Jeanine", which violates Judicial Political Independence Laws in other more decent
countries.
  
   
And I have seen huge Judicial Shows that lead to the accused being innocent but causing an enormous damage to the victim while at the same time causing huge Profits for the Media. The worst such case I have seen is the Destruction Case against Michael Jackson. Such shows include OJ Simpson and Bill Cosby.

Let's review some basic Principles of Law in a Decent Country without Judicial Corruption:
  
1) The Judicial System was not made to serve just one Noble Woman with Show or Representation Privileges over other Women. The case was in a scope that was the same for any Woman in the United States without any special Privileges of Representation of Taylor Swift.
2) Taylor Swift has no right and did not even try to obtain the Right to Represent all the Women of the United States and if she did have that right then all the Women in the United States would have the right to claim that they represent all the Women in the United States, which would make the Legal Defence unfair and biased from the start for the accuser would obviously be vastly overpowered in relation to the Defence.
3) The Accused does not legally represent all the Men that Grope in the United States and there was no legal provision anywhere in the case where such claimed was filed. Also it is to note that it was not a class action suit so the whole representation thing is a Legal Lie designed to Entertain and sell more News.
4) The Evidence that was provided clearly stated, with a Photo that was also exposed as a Media Circus Function that the Man depicted was unequivocally the man that was being accused beyond any reasonable doubt. Putting that obvious fact in question is paramount to accuse all Men that have any kind of contact with Taylor Swift as potential representations of all the Gropers in the World ready to take the wrath of all the Women in the World. In short it also accuses Me of groping Taylor Swift when the real sex offender, to busy caring for Caresses on Taylor Swift is Rupert Murdoch who is making it a Sex Show from a Nobility case for the Privileged Representations that did not even exist.
5) The Taylor Swift Groping case was not made in the context of her Corporate Persona and her International Institutional Artistic Enterprises. It was a Private Offence and it should have not become a profitable Corporate Product for sale and profit at the expense of the Honour, Fairness and Credibility of the Court who was not dealing with a Private case but with a Corporate Entertainment Product.
   
Now let Me explain how a Decent Business and Judicial System works, with an example.
  
   
The Situation is: I create a Social Network with a 3D Game Interface.

The Social Network can promote new Artists and of course new Female Artists. Some Female Artists Sing, Some Female Artists Depict Graphical and 3D Art and some Female Artists Fashion Model.

The all have the same Legal Rights and they all have a Registered Business and Patent where the material they make belongs to them and those she granted the right of usage so they are all Entertainment Businesses since they all have Celebrity Status.

But it is also a Chat System, a Social Network System and if that was not enough the System owns a Super Yacht and makes Beach Entertainment Products like Photos of Female Models in the Beach, for a Social Network System where users are awarded trips to the Social Network's Fan Ship.

The Possibility that any Celebrity Woman from a base of some 30 Social Celebrities get Groped would be about 600 to 1000% Higher than on Taylor Swift. Yet if any one of them complains in Public under the Terms of Taylor Swift I would fire them Immediately.

For that I create Female Protection Groups, seeking help, advise and Certification from Recognized Female Defence Institutions that provide Certification such as the National Women's Ministry and the UN Women that seek to provide the protection to the Woman in her Private Life and Reputation by doing just that: Separating Business Shows from her Private Life.

The Suggestions and Adaptations made by the Female Defence Groups are incorporated dynamically according to the Specifications Needed by the Defence Groups and the Local Laws so I do not control the definite form of Human Right Protections for Women against Sexual Abuse, ensuring that it is hard to cheat even by Me and respecting the Democratic and Institutional Decisions of the Right Groups.

That means that if any Woman Celebrity is Groped on a Personal Level all the Media in the System have instructions to NOT put any of it on their Systems for Media Circus. Since the Celebrity's Public Work is as a Business and the Woman in the Celebrity has the right to enjoy her Privacy in good and bad times as well without having to carry with the shadow of being a Victim as a Business, but as being a Winner that has the right to express herself as she pleases as a Celebrity System (something that is strictly forbidden in FoxNews for Taylor Swift who acts basically like Rupert Murdoch's Inflatable Toy and I deeply regret such humiliation from a House Member).

In all Court Cases with the Oversee of Women Right Groups:
  
1) Both the Defendant and the Accuser have Rights.
2) Both parts represent themselves in a Private case.
3) The case is private because it is not turned into an Entertainment Product by the System's Media.
4) Anybody that has Licences of use of the Material made by the System that does not respect the Privacy and the Judicial Privacy of System Members might get their Licences Revoked so that they cannot use ANY material from that Artist and/or ANY of the Artists in the Entire System.
   
I do not make Circus Functions to immorally gain a lot of Money out of taking Advantage of the Fact that a Woman was Sexually Abused.

The Real groper in that case has a name:
Rupert Murdoch, the Owner of the Sex Abuse Circus FoxNews.


All Women have a risk to be sexually abused around People they don't know, but that does not mean all Women have to be Victims of a Sexual Abuse Show for the Profit of Corrupt Media that like to sell Women Humiliation.
  
   
I am not Pressing Charges against Taylor Swift Corporation for that case in the current context and with what I know
up until now.
  
  
Full and Complete respect to Taylor Swift, as an Individual with Privacy and as a Celebrity Institution with Public Products, in BOTH Scenarios. THAT is True, LEGAL Procedure to Protect ALL WOMEN, not just the Super Rich.
  
I am a Real TRIBalance and about the BBC News...

Nobody knows about then when they refuse to exist.
   

Lyrics:
  
The Lady In Red - Chris de Burgh

I've never seen you looking so lovely as you did tonight
I've never seen you shine so bright
I've never seen so many men ask you if you wanted to dance
They're looking for a little romance, given half a chance
And I have never seen that dress you're wearing
Or the highlights in your hair that catch your eyes
I have been blind

The lady in red is dancing with me, cheek to cheek
There's nobody here, it's just you and me
It's where I want to be
But I hardly know this beauty by my side
I'll never forget the way you look tonight

I've never seen you looking so gorgeous as you did tonight
I've never seen you shine so bright, you were amazing
I've never seen so many people want to be there by your side
And when you turned to me and smiled, it took my breath away
And I have never had such a feeling
Such a feeling of complete and utter love, as I do tonight

The lady in red is dancing with me, cheek to cheek
There's nobody here, it's just you and me
It's where I want to be
But I hardly know this beauty by my side
I'll never forget the way you look tonight

I never will forget the way you look tonight
The lady in red, the lady in red
The lady in red, my lady in red

I love you

Written by Chris De Burgh • Copyright © Universal Music Publishing Group

Back to index