Visions of a Freeman -
Brain Age - 20, November of 2016
An ancient view over
Reality seen from the Eyes of a TRIBalance.
Division by Zero and the False Abortion Equality Argument.
Victorian abortion law ‘breaches
Women’s Equality leader calls for decriminalisation as party is
set to gather for its first conference
[Image not needed]
Sunday 20 November 2016 00.04 GMT
A campaign to push for abortion to be removed from the justice
statutes and decriminalised is to be launched this month by the
country’s newest political party.
Sophie Walker, leader of the non-partisan Women’s Equality
party, said it was time that abortion was
made a sexual health and human rights issue, rather than
left languishing under “Victorian criminal law”, where a life
prison sentence still exists for procuring a termination. This
is a flagship policy for the party, which will hold its first
conference in Manchester next weekend. It hopes that with
pressure from its supporters, other political parties will take
up the issue.
The current legislation governing abortion is the 1861 Offences
Against the Person Act, which came into force decades before
women had the vote.
Abortion is part of life in mainland Britain: one in three women
will have an abortion before the age of 45, with the highest
rate among 21-year-olds. Rates have remained fairly constant
over the past few years, higher in England and Wales than in
Scotland, with 197,906 Britons and 5,190 non-British residents
having an abortion last year. About 98% are NHS-funded and the
vast majority, 80%, carried out at less than 10 weeks pregnant.
Under the 1861 act, and as amended by the Abortion Act 1967,
abortion remains a criminal offence; only cases that meet
certain caveats are exempt from prosecution. Two doctors must
sign to confirm that a woman’s or her unborn child’s health and
welfare is at risk, resulting, say campaigners, in the law
simply being circumvented in many cases. And it is also open to
political interference. The British Pregnancy Advisory Service
believes the rules work only because health professionals work
The WE party has grown to more than 65,000 members and 65
regional groups since its inception last year. It fielded its
first political candidates at local and regional elections this
year, including for the London mayor.
“This is really about making it very clear that
women’s healthcare rights are human
rights,” said Walker. “That is why we want to debate this
motion at our first conference and to put a focus on
prioritising and funding sexual health and wellbeing.
If you are denied control over your own
body then you are denied so many other controls over your
life. Any denial of reproductive rights is
a form of violence against women, and the massive funding
cuts ongoing in the UK are part of a real trend that is de-prioritising
Former Progressive Unionist party leader Dawn Purvis is on the
advisory board of Marie Stopes International, which provides
contraception and safe abortion services. She is to give a
keynote speech at the WE party conference on the position in
Northern Ireland, where several prosecutions are under way of
women who have used the so-called “abortion pill”.
“The situation in Northern Ireland is different to mainland
Britain in that, basically, a woman has to be about to die
before she is allowed a termination,” Purvis said. “Rape or
incest or foetal abnormality are not circumstances under which
an abortion will be allowed. We’re seeing women being prosecuted
and convicted as criminals – one was reported by her GP after
she had gone to him for help, another is a woman being
prosecuted for helping her daughter.
“But thankfully we are seeing more and more legal challenges –
late last year we had a ruling that the stance of the Ministry
of Justice was incompatible with international standards on
Diana Johnson, Labour MP for Kingston upon Hull North, has
tabled a 10-minute bill for the spring when she will also raise
the issue of decriminalising abortion. She does not want to
change time limits but wants medical procedures to be governed
by clinicians, rather than the criminal law.
“That any woman procuring an abortion is potentially facing a
prison sentence of life under legislation dating from 1861 is
patently something that needs looking at carefully,” she said. “Decriminalising
abortion, for both health professionals and for women, would put
the issue with clinicians and health experts, where it belongs.”
Using an Intrauterine Device might be a Human Right, but Killing a Baby in Macro
Universe violates the Human Rights of the Baby. They assume that the new Baby
does not have Human Rights, which is absurd.
That news mentions Abortions like a Health Care Right, like if a Baby were an
Illness and it totally disregards the fact that a Baby is also a Human and thus
has Human Rights. Also abortion is not just about control of a Woman's Body, but
a Babies Body as well.
I don't see how Aborting Babies is a Reproductive Right. Quite contrary, it
would be Anti-Reproductive Rights.
Women can simply use an Intrauterine Device that aborts pregnancies. It is far
less expensive and troublesome than abortions and does not require to fight for
the right to Kill an Advanced Fetus Baby, since those devices, often made
with Plastics don't allow the Fetus to form, thus no Baby in the Macro Universe
(Our Visible World) is killed, since it
cancels the process at Microscopic Levels.
Abortion could much as "Equality" as:
||My Actions on a Logical Computer Process being
related to a Weird Corrupt Dark Cult Trap in some Parallel Situational
||The actions of one person being mirrored in a very
dishonest way to the actions of another with a view to trying to justify
||The blending of two Logical Pages of Random Computer
Code from two totally different Software Solutions without much
attention to order and hoping it will work.
||Illegal and Dishonest Framing without the victims
knowing to try to mix entirely different contexts with invalid arguments
just to try to force them to look the same.
||Trying to relate Physical Abortion of Babies with
the cancelling of Intellectual Compromises.
||Trying to equate the so called right to kill that
equates with a Male Part that does not even have such right at all thus
there is no equality between Women and Men in things that only Women can
I am a Computer Programmer and we Computer Programmers work with System
Common-Limit, which I can call [System Purple]. Computer [System Purple] is very
strict, for example it is enough to put one little letter in the wrong place to
crash a whole software made with perhaps millions of letters in the Computer
If one single letter can crash a whole Computer Program Code, imagine the
possibilities there are that two software with totally different codes that are
have a heavy random and context implication can work well parallel to each other
on the same instance without even knowing the other code that is being combined.
If one misplaced letter is enough to crash a Software Code Run due to the High
[System Purple] then many more letters have the chance to cause many more
I did pay attention to the arguments in that news and the code simply does not
compute, it is Dividing by an Equivalent Right that Men have to Abort, when
actually that value is Zero, because we Men do not get pregnant, if we did, we
would be Women.
(([Abortion Rights = X] * [Men Abortion Rights = 0]) / [Equality = 2]) =
[Rightfulness = 0]
(X * 0) / 2 = 0
States: 2, -6, 4. Coherency.