Visions of a Freeman - Brain Age - 14, November of 2016

Welcome to:
An ancient view over eroded lands.

Reality seen from the Eyes of a TRIBalance.

Date is:
November 14, 2016

A Culture of Masochist Dolls that do not Value Human Dignity.
Police searching for man who violated Taylor Swift restraining order
By Annie Reuter Published November 10, 2016 Taste of Country

A warrant has been issued for the arrest of a man in Texas who stalked Taylor Swift after a recent concert at Austin’s Circuit of Americas. Frank Andrew Hoover, 39, allegedly attempted to corner Swift near her private jet following the show, her only concert of 2016.

According to the Austin-American Statesman, Swift has a lifetime restraining order against Hoover, which was filed in Kansas and demands he not come within 500 feet of her. An affidavit states that Hoover was attempting to get a photograph of Swift at a private hangar at Austin-Bergstrom International Airport and came within 25 to 50 feet of the singer and her family, thus violating the protective order.

As a result, police have filed a warrant for his arrest. Hoover has also been sending Swift’s father questionable and threatening emails about his daughter.

“I’ve placed my life in your hands as you could easily file suit for my violation of the lifetime protective order,” Hoover wrote in one message. “Despite the lifetime ban … I must continue forward as I have no other path in life.”

In September, Hoover said that God told him that he and Swift would make the world a more peaceful place: “Without her, I walk the earth alone forever and she’ll continue to experience failed relationships that break her heart.”

Later, his emails became more threatening as he degraded Swift and her father after the Oct. 22 incident at the airplane hangar. One email included an attached photo of Swift with a red caption that read, “A whore named Satan dies.

If found and convicted, Hoover could spend up to 10 years in prison for violating his restraining order.
Andy Cohen talks awkward Taylor Swift run-in, Madonna, Dolly Parton and more in new book
Published November 14, 2016

Andy Cohen is sharing even more stories from his years of schmoozing with celebrities.

In his new book, "Superficial: More Adventures from the Andy Cohen Diaries," the "Watch What Happens Live" host dishes about experiencing Katy Perry and Taylor Swift's bad blood firsthand, John Mayer narrowly avoiding Jennifer Aniston, turning down two Oprah Winfrey invitations and what he personally witnessed when Michael Strahan abruptly left "Live! With Kelly."

Not to mention, he knows what Madonna smells like.

Prior to the release of his new book, which comes out Tuesday, Cohen admitted to ET that he was "worried" he might end up getting the silent treatment from a few famous folks. "People are going to be pissed, because I'm really revealing a lot," he confessed. "I'm moving the goal post, and I just feel like if I'm going to do it again, it has to be bigger and better and dishier."

Here's a look at seven of the biggest "Superficial" bombshells:

1. Taylor Swift

Cohen recounts that when at the Met Ball this year with Sarah Jessica Parker, whom he attends the event with every year, he had a brief run-in with Swift at the bar. According to Cohen, the "Shake It Off" singer was searching for a spot to watch Lady Gaga's performance when Cohen noticed an open area by Perry.

"Why I felt I needed to get involved I will never know (maybe I was auditioning for her squad?) but I innocently said exactly the wrong thing to her, which was, 'Your friend Katy is sitting in the corner and there's plenty of room around her,'" he recalls.

Cohen says Swift then asked, "Katy who?"

"I said, 'Perry,' at which point she clearly let me know that she's the exact opposite of her friend," he continues. Cohen says he then tried to make light of his misstep, which led Swift to instruct him not to mention this on his show.

"She didn't threaten me about putting it in my book, so here we are," Cohen quipped, adding that he failed his "squad-ition!"

2. John Mayer and Jennifer Aniston

Cohen writes that he nearly witnessed a reunion between these exes after hosting the "Friends" reunion during the tribute to TV director and producer, James Burrows, last February. The 48-year-old TV personality says he was having a drink with Mayer when he noticed the cast of "Friends," sans Matthew Perry, having dinner at a nearby table.

"We realized they had to walk by our table to leave and that would be a 'moment,'" Cohen recounts. He decided to instead greet the cast, but Mayer did not join him. "As much as I would've loved to see the ultimate reunion -- Aniston and Mayer -- we left before they did and went to bed. Separately."

3. Michael Strahan

Cohen writes that in addition to Swift, he also had an awkward interaction with Strahan at the Met Gala. On his radio show, Cohen brought up Strahan leaving "Live!" for "Good Morning America," and claims the former NFL pro said that "hurt his feelings."

After insisting that he said nothing bad about Strahan, the two "hugged it out."

Cohen also writes that despite all the reports, he was never contacted by ABC about replacing Strahan as Kelly Ripa's permanent co-host.

4. Oprah Winfrey

"Today was the day I said no to Oprah," Cohen writes about Jan. 6, 2015. The TV host says that he was asked to appear on OWN's "Oprah: Where Are They Now?" but "passed" because he felt "people should pretty much know where I am now."

Cohen says he then turned down Winfrey a second time when Gayle King asked if he and Anderson Cooper wanted to have brunch with them in Santa Barbara, Calif. He declined the invitation because he had to fly back to New York to film a live show, but admits that he experienced major "FOMOBO, which is Fear of Missing Out on Brunch at Oprah's."

5. Madonna

Cohen proves he's one of Madonna's biggest fans in his new book. At a star-studded event in May 2015, he recalls kissing her ring. "Literally kneeled by her at her table and said I didn't like all the ageism being leveled at her," he writes.

Cohen also insists that Madonna has a distinct smell. "Are there Madonna-approved scents, and then does she have someone in there spraying her scent before she gets there?" he ponders.

Also of note, Cohen says country legend Dolly Parton smells like "a combination of dairy and perfume."

6. Tori Spelling

Cohen says he found himself in a "complete pickle" with Tori Spelling after making fun of her on "WWHL" for burning herself on a hibachi at Benihana. The "Beverly Hills, 90210" actress sent him an email expressing how upset she was over the joke and that after the burn, she would "never be able to use her arm again," Cohen claims.

After "profusely apologizing," Cohen writes that he still "has a bad feeling about this" relationship.

7. Cher

Cohen reveals that he nearly convinced Cher to do a radio show with him that would take place out of her home. "I told her, you can do it from your house and not have to worry about makeup or anything," he recalls.

He says he also missed an opportunity to get a tour of the 70-year-old music icon's bedroom, which he greatly regrets.

Tune in tonight for ET's interview with Cohen, and get even more details on these jaw-dropping celebrity accounts.
Photo that allegedly shows Taylor Swift's assault leaked online
Published November 14, 2016

A photo that was sealed by a judge as part of evidence in a lawsuit against a former Denver radio DJ who Taylor Swift says assaulted her has leaked online.

Swift had asked the judge to seal the evidence due to its scandalous nature, saying the tabloids would have a field day should it be allowed to become public.

In the photo published by TMZ, Swift stands between David Mueller and another woman at a 2013 meet-and-greet. Swift has her arms around Mueller and the woman. The then-DJ appears to have his right hand behind her lower back, possibly on her butt.

The singer alleged Mueller grabbed her butt while posing for a photo.

"Right as the moment came for us to pose for the photo, he took his hand and put it up my dress and grabbed onto my ass cheek and no matter how much I scooted over it was still there," Swift said in her deposition. "It was completely intentional, I've never been so sure of anything in my life."

In the photo, Swift is leaning in closely to the woman with some space between her and Mueller.

She added that she felt "violated in a way I had never experienced before."

Mueller has denied the accusations.

A rep for Swift did not return FOX411's request for comment.
The Main Ass Groper in the United States.

Taylor Swift contributing with the Main Celebrity Cyber Ass Groper in the USA.
Suddenly Packing More Back

4/5/2016 8:22 AM PDT BY TMZ STAFF
Taylor Swift's ass will NOT be contained -- the thing has been busting out lately, and looks great, but also looks, ummm ... different.

Taylor's lady lumps were majorly on display at the iHeartRadio Awards over the weekend as she showed up in a skintight black bodysuit. We did some deep research, checking out a bunch of Taylor butt shots from the last year ... and she's definitely shown some growth.
Butt pads? Squats? Who knows?

We're sure of one thing -- Calvin Harris ain't complaining.
Taylor Swift refuses to have a say or demand a right for a Reply on Media that uses her Copyrighted Material thus allowing a Culture of Impunity while abusing Celebrities.

By DELIBERATELY ALLOWING TMZ to Publish the Sealed Images without Taylor asking for a Copyright Block against TMZ for violating a Court Order and continuing to grant TMZ permission to use her Copyrighted Material even if it is illegal (A Judge clearly marked it as sealed for her own security and by her own request) Taylor Swift contributes to a Culture of Complicity for Abuse against all Celebrities.

Asking a Court and a Judge to issue a Statement that is later not recognized or enforced by the party that solicited it is even worse than giving a false declaration to the Police and that crime has Penal Penalties.

By allowing TMZ to continue to use her Heavily Copyrighted Material Taylor Swift is also RESPONSIBLE for that Material in any Legal Seal Case issued by a Court and a Judge.

The reasonable thing to do is that Taylor Swift finally sues TMZ and asks TMZ for a Desist. At any case the Art Academies and the Artist Unions should move to protect the Rights of all Artists because that is an issue that affects the entire Art Celebrity Sector of the United States, which is today in a Crisis. All USA Women Artist deserve to have their DIGNITY and HUMAN RIGHTS RESPECTED.
The Refusal of some Celebrities to recognize Human Dignity in exchange for Fame.

In Venezuela it is as simple as recognizing Celebrities that do not support Articles for Dignity, Articles for a Right for a
Reply and Articles for Honor in the Venezuelan Constitution.

Characteristics of some Complicit with abuse against the Users and the Art Community:

1) They own their Copyrighted Material and proceed aggressively against any unauthorized use when they are being questioned, to stifle Freedom of Speech and Block the Debate.
2) They Support a Media System that does not recognize the Right of the Users, the People to get a Reply or even have an Opinion.
3) They know there is more than enough sufficient technology to allow them to post a Reply about their content at their Content Client's Web Site. But they don't care to support their own Feedback.
4) If they don't care to support their own feedback, then they would care far less about the Feedback of their own Users and Fans.
5) When it is clear that there is no regards to Feedback for themselves and for the users it is clear that those Celebrities do not serve "We the People" and are not Democratic Celebrities and are instead a type of Aristocratic Nobility, specially if they don't even have to work as a singer to be famous all Year doing no concerts.
6) Since they don't care about their Right for a Reply and even less for the Right of their Fans, those Celebrities may not even have a Social Network, simply because they don't even care what People think about them or even what they can do to sustain their own Purpose as an Institution of Civilization.
7) Some Celebrities do not want their Voice and Opinions to be known and those are willing to act like Slaves to the Media that uses them and uses their own users, in a Denial of Social Rights which is also often based on Social Discrimination.
8) Since those Celebrities do not support having a Voice themselves and of course do not support the People having a Voice for their opinions as well, they increase misunderstandings and thus the Political Polarization of Society which in turn can degrade into Social and Domestic Violence.
9) If a Celebrity does care about their Voice and thus the Concerns of their own Fans that Celebrity would have a Social Network where the Celebrity can respond to the Fans and their concerns without needing the approval of External Media to do so.
10) If a Celebrity does care about their Voice and thus the Concerns of their own Artist Communities they would channel and give Voice to Art Academies, Artist Unions, their Artist Group, Modern Digital Media with Dynamic Updating and Themselves aside from just the Media that does not allow a Right for a Reply such as FoxNews.
Fashion Ask Hadley

When it comes to fashion, the Trumps are not the new Obamas

Call it elitism or snobbery, but the fashion industry is unlikely to hold Donald and Melania up as icons. Plus: was Taylor Swift to blame for the election result?

[Image not needed]
Fashion icons? Donald Trump with his daughter Ivanka (left) and wife Melania (right) in June 2016. Photograph: Carlo Allegri/Reuters

Hadley Freeman
Monday 14 November 2016 16.19 GMT

The Obamas had an impact on fashion. What effect will the Trump presidency have on the fashion industry?

Carrie, by email

Hello, readers.I’m writing this from under my bed, where I’ve been wearing my pantsuit for seven days straight now. I have drunk all the alcohol in the house so have since moved on to cleaning fluids. I’m seeing spots, which is what I hoped for because I think we’ve all had quite enough of reality this week. Washing-up liquid is my tipple of choice now, folks.

Maybe you’ve turned to this article to get a break from all the election coverage. Light relief, perhaps, or maybe just a change of tune. And I want to oblige you, I really do. But it’s hard to be all business-as-usual – making jokes like, “Ha ha, hotpants are stupid,” and “OMG did you see what Beyoncé wore this week?” (that’s usually what happens here, right?) – when you’re starting to eye up the oven cleaner as a chaser.

Come on, Freeman. You’re a professional. You covered the hell that is Milan menswear fashion weeks four years running – you can handle this. So what can we say about the Trump era – [gags on own tongue] – from a fashion perspective? Barack and Michelle Obama did affect fashion. In fact, Michelle is on the cover of US Vogue this month – again – looking so gorgeous you wonder how any models get jobs these days.

Their popularity among fashion folk is because the Obamas are genuinely – and I’m going to use a technical term here so have a dictionary ready – hot as hell. This demographic – “coastal elites”, as I believe they are called nowadays – genuinely liked them, and that made it even easier to hold them up as fashion icons.

Which brings us to the Trumps. Now, I appreciate we should all be approaching this presidency with an open mind and hopeful heart and yadda yadda yadda. But I think it’s a pretty safe bet that Anna Wintour won’t be inviting Mr and Mrs Trump to grace the pages of her magazine with quite the same joy in her heart as she did with the Obamas. I’m sure Trump supporters – and doubtless Trump himself – will put this down to “elitism” and “snobbery”, and that’s a fair point, of course, given Vogue’s well-known prejudice against Manhattan billionaires. And yet, despite that, Vogue has been a friend of the Trump family for decades, as is inevitable given that Wintour and Trump were both major figures in 80s New York so probably waved at each other across the Four Seasons every other day for the past three decades. Ivanka, Trump’s adored (a little too adored for the comfort of some of us) daughter, has been featured in gushing fashion magazine articles for years. And yet, somehow I don’t think that’s going to happen any more. It’s hard to present a young woman as the paragon of modern day feminism – she has babies … and works! And gets a daily blow dry! HOW DOES SHE DO IT!?!? – when her father is on tape talking about his fondness for giving women surprise manual smear tests.

It’s almost poetic, really: all his life Trump just wanted respect, and his urge to run was almost certainly lit when Obama publicly mocked him at the 2011 White House Correspondents’ Dinner. And he won! But at the cost of ever him or his family ever having any respect from precisely the kind of people he always wanted it from. Is this an O Henry short story or a Dilbert cartoon strip? So in terms of their affect on high fashion, no, I don’t think the Trumps will have much of an impact. Is this elitism or just fashion people not feeling especially fond of a politician who won by employing blatantly misogynistic and racist rhetoric? Because of all the things you can criticise the fashion industry for, it does, at least, employ a lot of women and gay men. So it tends to have a pretty liberal bent, and you can call that elitism if you like, but it looks more like people simply following their beliefs to me. I say potato, you say grab ’em by the pussy. Pass the oven cleaner.

[Image not needed]
Taylor Swift … why the reticence? Photograph: Dominic Lipinski/PA

As we know, politics are decided by celebrities these days. Which celebrities failed us this time?

Nadia, by email

Look, I have no appetite for the blame game. What’s the point? We will never have a woman president because a
short-fingered vulgarian is about to destroy the world. But! I will make an exception when it comes to blaming celebrities and TAYLOR SWIFT I AM LOOKING AT YOU.

As we all know now, white women without college degrees voted for Trump. But you know who white women listen to? That’s right – Taylor Swift. Swift remained intriguingly silent during the campaign, which seemed odd, considering her much-vaunted best friend, Lena Dunham, was anything but. Even Swift’s eventual, and very last-minute, admission that she was voting for Clinton was made through the medium of a polo neck (it’s an Instagram thing) rather than a full-throated endorsement.

So why the reticence, Tay-Tay? Maybe she feared alienating her country-and-western base. Maybe her well-known loathing for Katy Perry, who has long been a Clinton supporter, trumped her politics. Maybe she’s just a big coward. Who knows? But you know what, Taylor? Making music videos with Victoria’s Secret models about how much you love female solidarity means sod all if you can’t even be bothered to speak up for a woman running against a raging misogynist. Walk the walk, Swiftie.

Post your questions to Hadley Freeman, Ask Hadley, The Guardian, Kings Place, 90 York Way, London N1 9GU. Email
Runaway cow 'rugby tackled' in Western Australia

5 hours ago
After an ocean swim, the errant bovine bolted through the Perth suburbs

A cow on the loose for more than 24 hours since escaping from a cattle ship at Western Australia's busiest cargo port has been recaptured by rangers.

The animal absconded while being loaded at Fremantle Harbour, jumped into the water and swam to shore.

Several eyewitnesses spotted the animal roaming coastal parks and, apparently, enjoying a beachside sunset.

The cow was eventually caught on the railway 7km (four miles) away in the western suburbs of Perth on Monday.

Josh Gammon-Carson, from Fremantle Sea Rescue, was called out after the cow was spotted in the water.

"We used our jet ski to safely try and assist it and guide it back to the nearest beach, where it could actually get out of the water safely, which it did," he told the BBC.

"Unfortunately the area wasn't properly contained and the cow escaped from there and ran off into land."
Fremantle Sea Rescue answered the call when they heard a cow was in the water

Despite a number of sightings on Sunday afternoon, the cow managed to elude council rangers.

One woman claimed on social media that she spotted the animal running around the coastal park, while another woman photographed the beast at the beach as the sun set.

The local council confirmed that the animal was captured on a railway line in the Perth's western suburbs.

"The freight line operator has stopped the trains," a city spokeswoman said in a statement.

"Owners the Wellard Group, vets and rangers are on the site."

Ten News reporter Beau Pearson who was at the scene told Radio 6PR it took a significant effort before the cow was loaded back on to a truck.

"It was a bit of a standoff for a few hours here in the sun," he said.

"It took about five blokes to rugby tackle him down on the railway track."

Australia's annual live-cattle exports - sent to countries including Indonesia, Vietnam and China - are valued at A$1.4 billion (Ł850m, $1bn).

For the Crimes of:

1) Conspiracy.
2) Public Conspiracy Planning.
3) Harrasment.
4) Putting a Price on My Head and this endangering My Life.
Taylor Swift - Bad Blood ft. Kendrick Lamar
Oct. 28, 2016
At the amfAR Inspiration Gala in L.A.
  November 3, 2016
At Premiere of A Street Cat Named Bob.
A film, about a young homeless musician and his unlikely friendship with a cat.
Hilton accessorized her look with a jeweled headband, while Kate chose to add a pop of color with deep red heels and a matching maroon Bayswater clutch by Mulberry.

The royal topped it off with a symbolic poppy in honor of the upcoming Remembrance Day.
Taylor Swift is not abandoned.

Taylor Swift is a Main Guest Member at My House.

I am not the kind that Tolerates Abuse.

Hate was not required to make this Page.

The Idea is not to Break the Broken, but to Debate about Solutions.
Date is:
November 16, 2016
Katy Perry marked this as a Favorite:
THE CURE - A Forest
Should website have published leaked Taylor Swift photo?
By Diana Falzone Published November 15, 2016
Last month, a judge granted a motion to seal a photo that Taylor Swift’s legal team claimed was proof she’d been sexually assaulted by a radio DJ in 2014, but TMZ published the photo over the weekend, making it available to the public.

Experts say TMZ made the wrong call in publishing the image.

“Sometimes, a court will seal evidence in a high-profile lawsuit because they don't want to taint the possible jury pool…” said New York attorney Lance Fletcher. “Once the court makes this ruling, it must be respected, so TMZ is wrong for publishing a sealed photo."

Swift is being sued by former radio DJ David Mueller, who claims Swift’s groping accusations lost him his job. The pop star has since countersued Mueller.

"Being a public figure means evidence in your lawsuit is newsworthy because everyone wants to know about it but it also means your right to a fair trial may be damaged because it could taint the jury pool," Fletcher told us.
The image in question shows Swift and Mueller posing for a photo with another woman. Swift is leaning toward the other woman, away from Mueller, and his arm is behind her backside. The singer claims Mueller reached his hand up her skirt and grabbed her butt.

Abby Schreiber, managing editor at Paper Magazine, said TMZ was wrong to publish the image.

“TMZ should not have run the photo. Neither they nor any other media outlets are above the law.”

Cate Meighan, a radio entertainment reporter, agreed with Schreiber.

“I think this photo falls into questionable territory and many other outlets wouldn't have touched it,” she said. “The fact that it was sealed means that a court and legal team somewhere agreed that it shouldn't see the light of day. TMZ's [decision] to post it in spite of that certainly now sends a message that anything that comes their way may now be considered fair game.”

But Naughty’s Rob Shuter said the picture should not have been sealed in the first place due to Swift’s mega stardom.

“The story is national news and the picture has great news value,” argued Shuter. “If you see the image, it isn't pornographic or offense but helps you understand the story better.”

Amy Edelstein, a supervising social worker at the victim organization Safe Horizon, said that public figures are entitled to the same privacy as anyone else.

“Celebrities are individuals like you and I, and deserve privacy,” she said. “Publishing photos of an alleged sexual assault is not OK and can further traumatize a survivor who now has to deal with the violation of privacy, increased scrutiny and potential negative comments, from the public.”

In a deposition, Swift said of the incident, “Right as the moment came for us to pose for the photo, he took his hand and put it up my dress and grabbed onto my ass cheek and no matter how much I scooted over it was still there. It was completely intentional, I've never been so sure of anything in my life."
Mueller has denied the accusations.

FOX411 reached out to Taylor Swift and TMZ but did not receive comment.

Fox Reporter and FOX411 host Diana Falzone covers celebrity news and interviews some of today's top celebrities and newsmakers. You can follow her on Twitter @dianafalzone.
Fox News Run As A ‘Playboy Mansion-Like Cult,’ Ex-Host Claims

Andrea Tantaros has filed a lawsuit against disgraced former chairman Roger Ailes and several top executives.
08/23/2016 01:45 pm ET | Updated Aug 23, 2016

Michael Calderone
Senior Media Reporter, The Huffington Post
Andrea Tantaros, far right, filed a sexual harassment lawsuit against Roger Ailes and several top executives.

NEW YORK ― Former Fox News host Andrea Tantaros claims in an explosive new lawsuit that disgraced ex-network chairman Roger Ailes sexually harassed her and that high-ranking executives fostered a newsroom culture in which abusive behavior flourished.

“Fox News masquerades as defender of traditional family values, but behind the scenes, it operates like a sex-fueled, Playboy Mansion-like cult, steeped in intimidation, indecency and misogyny,” the suit reads.

Ailes was “the primary culprit,” according to the suit, but “his actions were condoned by his most senior lieutenants who engaged in a concerted effort to silence Tantaros by threats, humiliation, and retaliation.”

Tantaros’ suit is the second leveled against Ailes, but the first to name the network itself and several current executives as co-defendants ― recently promoted co-president Bill Shine, general counsel Dianne Brandi, media relations chief Irena Briganti and executive vice president Suzanne Scott.

Last month, former “Fox & Friends” host Gretchen Carlson opened the floodgates of sexual harassment accusations against Ailes, a legendary TV executive who built and ran Fox News for two decades after serving as a leading Republican operative and former adviser to three presidents. Ailes is reportedly now advising Republican nominee Donald Trump ahead of next month’s first presidential debate with Democratic rival Hillary Clinton.

Less than two weeks after Carlson made her claims, Ailes stepped down as Fox News chairman amid widespread accusations about his behavior toward women throughout his careers in media and politics. At least 20 women ― including star anchor Megyn Kelly and a former Fox booker who described a harrowing two decades of harassment ― have reportedly come forward as part of an ongoing investigation launched by 21st Century Fox, the Murdoch-led parent company of Fox News.

Tantaros first leveled accusations against Ailes two weeks ago in an interview with New York magazine. She expanded on those claims in the suit filed Monday in New York State Supreme Court, detailing what she believes to be internal payback for rebuffing the network chief’s advances. Tantaros is represented by attorney Judd Berstein, who previously represented Brian Lewis, the network’s former media relations chief.

In the suit, Tantaros described Ailes as a “sexual predator” who made inappropriate comments about her body and asked her to twirl for him in his office ― a request similar to those described by other women at Fox News. “I bet you look good in a bikini,” she claims Ailes said in one conversation.

She also described Ailes ― known for making racially insensitive and homophobic comments ― as making unflattering remarks about her Fox News colleague, according to the suit.

Tantaros alleged that she was reassigned from her job on “The Five,” which aired at a more coveted 5 p.m. time slot, to noon program “Outnumbered” because she turned down Ailes’ advances.

Fox News has claimed Tantaros, who has been off the air for several months, breached her contract by not receiving necessary approval to work on a book.

A Fox News spokeswoman said on Tuesday that the network would not comment on pending litigation.

In the suit, Tantaros claimed that Fox News’ notoriously combative public relations department leaked unflattering information about her, didn’t adequately promote her, refused legitimate media requests, and used “sock puppet” social media accounts to post or direct negative comments about her.

The public relations department, under previous chief Lewis, reportedly posted pro-Fox comments on news articles using dummy accounts. Ailes also reportedly orchestrated his own anonymous media pushback operation through The Cable Game, a blog that hyped the network (and himself) while smearing rival hosts and media reporters deemed critical of Fox.

Tantaros alleged in the suit that Briganti had a “retaliatory media vendetta against her” and that Shine, ignoring her complaints, once described the PR chief as “like a rabid dog on a chain that we can’t control.” The former Fox host labeled Shine as Ailes’ “co-conspirator” in overseeing a toxic workplace culture.

In the suit, Tantaros also described host Bill O’Reilly ― who, in 2004, settled a high-profile sexual harassment
suit leveled by a former producer ― as once asking her to stay with him at a “very private” place in Long Island and expressing a desire to see her “as a wild girl.”

And former Massachusetts senator and Fox News contributor Scott Brown made “sexually inappropriate comments” about Tantaros, according to the suit, and once grabbed her waist while she was buying lunch.

Brown denied the accusations on Twitter. “As a survivor of sexual abuse, I would never perpetuate language or actions as described in FOX complaint,” he wrote. “Actions referenced are fabricated.”
At night time, around 22:00 p.m.
Refusal to recognize My Rights or even respond to My Complaints about.
Human Right Abuses.
Sexual Harassment.
Endangering My Guests.
Espionage on the Porn I View (I looked at Reverse Porn at other Office).
Espionage on calling Me "Free-Wheeling" (I call that the Karina Statement).
Attacking My Relations with China.
Religious Attack and Discrimination.
Psychological Harassment (Dementia).
Attempt to evade paying Me what I sued for before. (Cash Less).
Extortion against My Guests.
Illegal Scientific Experiments on Me.
About a Possible Extortion against My Guests.

It is possible that some of My Guests were used to Dance to My Words by creating Porn Content that was later used by the Porn Industry.
It possible that the Porn I saw was used by some of My Guests to attack Me or try to weaken Me. It is also possible that some of My Guests attacked Me directly in the Twitter Harassment case I called the "Burn Flowers". All those attacks could be sources of extortion against My Guests to avoid them contacting Me and to corrupt the Judicial System.

It has been four years with Guests now and there was plenty of time to try to do Me Great Harm with the Porn Industry, specially considering that when I did contact Celebrities, the other Celebrities could have known about Me
and that Barack Obama is implicated, the same President that due to neglect allowed the Suicide of Whitney Houston on the year 2012 and that the Corrupt Queen Elizabeth 2 is implicated.

In the case of Delta Goodrem and Emma Hewitt.

Creating Porn Content for the Porn Industry to hurt Me.
I can overlook it, unless it's necessary for their own security.
No new charges*1.
Harassing Me with the Porn I saw.
I can overlook it, unless it's necessary for their own security.
No new charges*1. No change to My Previous Statements.

Harassing Me directly with Porn.
That would be a Private Issue.
I can overlook it, unless it's necessary for their own security.
No new charges*1. No change to My Previous Statements.

1. Up to this date.

In the case of System Essentials Guests.

Paris Hilton.
Katy Perry.
Taylor Swift.
Nadia Ali.
Miley Cyrus.
Kate Middleton.
Laura Pausini.

Except for the exception that I will describe below, all of them that are involved in any Sexual Crime against Me should face the Full Extent of the Law and I Encourage that such information is Published at My Web Site and even possibly known to the Wider Academic TRIBalance Public by other means, to stop the total impunity of those types of crimes.

That might prompt some to complain that I am being Totally Merciless and Cruel and that I should have know that the System was Corrupted and that I should have observed the System Context, thus trying to trap Me in the Vicious Cycle.

That is clearly not the case, I did create an exception, it is them that do not want to agree with My Terms and it is them that do not have the Mercy, because they don't want to accept any exception but do want to pressure Me to create an exception, which is not fair on their part.

If they want an exception then they should grant an exception themselves.

You see if I write about reaching a settlement on the issue after speaking to them and then fix the amounts on how much they can convince Me, then the cheaters that started the Harassment and that participate in the Prostitution Porn Network will also most likely start to say that I am giving exceptions due to how much I like or do not like the Celebrity Guests, in Personality, in Body and in likeliness that they have a sentimental and sexual relation to Me. They cheated once, no reason to believe they won't cheat again. So if I try to be Merciful, the Cheat is that they will say that I base My Mercy in Personal Prefferences.

So here is the deal, in Context with the System that does include Mercy.

I can grant exceptions as long as:

1) I am not accused of basing those exceptions on Sexual Preferences.
2) I get to Privately Discus the issue with them with no leak needed.
3) We can establish a Life-Bound Physical and Philosophical Relation if agreed.

So if they want an Exception, then they have to allow an Exception.

If no Exception is allowed, then they get ALL THE WEIGHT OF THE LAW and so too the Rulers Responsible for their Leadership.

It is ultimately up to them.
It has always been up to them.
Bad Blood
Taylor Swift

'Cause baby now we got bad blood
You know it used to be mad love
So take a look at what you've done
'Cause baby now we got bad blood

(Hey) now we got problems
And I don't think we can solve them
You made a really deep cut
And baby now we got bad blood

(Hey) did you have to do this
I was thinking that you could be trusted
Did you have to ruin what was shining now it's all rusted
Did you have to hit me where I'm weak baby I couldn't breathe
I rubbed it in so deep
Salt in the wound like you're laughing right at me
Oh, it's so sad to think about the good times
You and I

'Cause baby now we got bad blood
You know it used to be mad love
So take a look at what you've done
'Cause baby now we got bad blood

(Hey) now we got problems
And I don't think we can solve them
You made a really deep cut
And baby now we got bad blood

(Hey) did you think we'd be fine
Still got scars on my back from your knife
So don't think it's in the past
These kind of wounds they last and they last
Now did you think it all through
All these things will catch up to you
And time can heal but this won't
So if you come in my way, just don't
Oh, it's so sad to think about the good times
You and I

'Cause baby now we got bad blood
You know it used to be mad love
So take a look at what you've done
'Cause baby now we got bad blood

(Hey) now we got problems
And I don't think we can solve them
You made a really deep cut
And baby now we got bad blood

(Hey) band-aids don't fix bullet holes
You say sorry just for show
You live like that, you live with ghosts (ghosts)
Band-aids don't fix bullet holes (hey)
You say sorry just for show (hey)
You live like that, you live with ghosts (hey)
Hm, if you love like that blood runs cold

'Cause baby now we got bad blood
You know it used to be mad love
So take a look at what you've done
'Cause baby now we got bad blood

(Hey) now we got problems
And I don't think we can solve them (think we can solve them)
You made a really deep cut
And baby now we got bad blood

('Cause now we got bad blood) 'cause baby now we got bad blood
You know it used to be mad love
So take a look at what you've done (look at what you've done)
'Cause baby now we got bad blood (woah)
Now we got problems
And I don't think we can solve them
You made a really deep cut
And baby now we got bad blood (hey)
A Forest
The Cure

Come closer and see
See into the trees
Find the girl
If you can
Come closer and see
See into the dark
Just follow your eyes
Just follow your eyes

I hear her voice
Calling my name
The sound is deep
In the dark
I hear her voice
And start to run
Into the trees
Into the trees

Into the trees
Suddenly I stop
But I know it's too late
I'm lost in a forest
All alone
The girl was never there
It's always the same
I'm running towards nothing
Again and again and again and again

Back to index